Life Without Parole

"The authors arguments are valid and strong." (Criminal Law and Criminal Justice Book Review) "Life without Paroleshould play a critical role in the discussion of crime and punishment in the United States. It should stimulate debate over the severity of life without parole sentencing, demanding that we not regard it as an automatic alternative to the death penalty, and that we scrutinize each sentence for consistency with American ideals of fairness and compassion." (Journal of African American History) "An essential title for students of criminal justice." (Library Journal) "An essential title for students of criminal justice." - Frances Sandiford (Library Journal) "Life Without Parole raises fundamental concerns both about the justice and the wisdom of this uniquely American phenomenon. It also poses uncomfortable questions for the reform community about the complex intersection between the death penalty and life without parole. If we hope to produce a justice system premised on human rights, we will have to find ways to respond to these challenges. Life Without Parole does a masterful job of pointing us in the right direction to begin that process." - Marc Mauer,Executive Director, The Sentencing Project "A timely and engaging wake-up call, Life Without Parole is the first sustained attempt to understand the meaning of the newest weapon in the American punitive armory. This provocative collection, clear-sighted in its prophetic potential, questions whether LWOP is a humane alternative to the death penalty or a fate worse than death. A must-read for all who want to understand the dark underside of twenty-first century democracy in a country where ever more citizens are condemned to a vast penal complex that redefines death as it expands criminality." - Colin Dayan,author of The Law is a White Dog "One frightening by-product of the American struggle over capital punishment is the proliferation of Life Without Parole as its bastard offspring. LWOP is embraced without scrutiny by abolitionists who assume that anything is better than execution. It is enshrined as a prosecutorial consolation prize when cases meet the technical standards for 'capital' murder but defendants lack blameworthiness. The unqualified condemnation of LWOP comes from a crazy displacement of distrust that puts extra suffering on offenders because citizens dont trust those who govern. Fighting capital punishment must be a central concern in the United States. But threats to human rights rarely develop one at a time, so injustice must be fought on multiple fields of engagement. Ogletree, Sarat, and their distinguished contributors perform an important public service by taking a sustained look at yet another dangerous punitive excess." - Franklin Zimring,William G. Simon Professor of Law, University of California, Berkeley