“In a series of finely calibrated close readings of Middle English and Anglo-Norman texts, Lipton finds that late medieval texts used traditional theory in ways that emphasized both the limitations and flexibilities of companionate marriage. . . . Lipton situates marriage within larger ecclesiastical and literary debates concerning sexuality, companionship, and power and posits that marriage ‘offered a microcosmic alternative vision for a broader social structure that worked to level the hierarchy of the three estates.’” —Modern Philology
“. . . Lipton offers an interesting theory about the connection of sacramental marriage with the rise of lay values and the self-legitimization of a ‘middle strata’ of merchants and small landowners just below the level of the gentry.” —Parergon
“The strength of Affections of the Mind is in Lipton’s ability to apply the medieval arguments about marriage to literary texts and to contextualize this analysis within the social and economic changes of late medieval England. As such, it provides the reader with a solid grounding in the marriage debates as well as with individual readings of texts both widely known and more obscure. The book is a fine example of the interplay between history and literature, one that can be a model for future scholarship.” —Sixteenth Century Journal
“The interpretive theme informing Emma Lipton’s book . . . is that ‘marriage is a deeply political institution.’ The strength and interest of Lipton’s study rest in the nearly universal appeal of marriage, however practiced, as a trope (more precisely, a synecdoche) for the structure of relations and affections in the larger society; celebrated or deplored, marriage looks like a microcosm ready-made for social analysis, satire, and utopian or dystopian critique.” —Journal of English and Germanic Philology
“With its nuanced attention to the ways that the discursive constructions of marriage and the social values of the middle social strata inflect one another, Lipton’s work elegantly illustrates how any analysis of gender and sexuality can be made richer and more precise by considering social status as well.” —Medieval Feminist Forum
“Lipton makes a case for viewing marriage as an idea and category of experience through which late-medieval people understood the world. The book as a whole offers interesting, often surprising, readings of literary works. Affections of the Mind reminds us to take a fresh look at the social significance that literary representations had in late-medieval England.” —Speculum
“A model of marriage derived from Saint Augustine and codified in the 12th century held that the substance of the sacrament of marriage was the mutual love between the two members of the couple, rather than consummation. Lipton demonstrates how this model was used by an emergent lay middle strata of society in late medieval England to exploit inherent contradictions within medieval theology and social hierarchy, and to raise questions concerning both clerical and secular authority.” —Research Book News
“Explores contested models of marriage in such works as The Book of Margery Kempe and Chaucer's Franklin's Tale.” —The Chronicle of Higher Education
“Emma Lipton's well-balanced and illuminating study addresses the surprisingly neglected political consequences of sacramental marriage as manifested in the literature of late medieval England. In unpredictable readings of a range of well-chosen texts from Chaucer's Franklin's Tale to the autobiography of Margery Kempe to the lesser studied Traitié pour Essampler les Amantz Marietz by Gower to the N-town plays, Lipton shows how sacramental marriage gripped the imagination of members of an emergent lay 'middle strata.' Although produced by the clergy, this unusually flexible doctrine, in her compelling argument, allowed these writers to challenge the privileges of both the clerisy and the aristocracy and to articulate a specifically bourgeois identity grounded in horizontal rather than hierarchical ties.” —Elizabeth Robertson, University of Colorado at Boulder
"Emma Lipton has written one of those rare books that that make one rethink an entire set of distinctions—between public and private spheres, between communal and individual identities, between secular and religious ideals, between authorized desire and subversive practices. From her opening sentence framing medieval institutions in terms of modern debates on gay marriage to her thoughtful and readable analyses of how literary works complicate our assumptions about both past and present, she presents arguments that will be of interest to historians, sociologists, theologians and anyone researching the histories of marriage, family, gender, and sexuality." —John M. Ganim, University of California, Riverside
